261 Extremely Powerful Metamodeling Questions You Do Not Know

What is involved in Metamodeling

Find out what the related areas are that Metamodeling connects with, associates with, correlates with or affects, and which require thought, deliberation, analysis, review and discussion. This unique checklist stands out in a sense that it is not per-se designed to give answers, but to engage the reader and lay out a Metamodeling thinking-frame.

How far is your company on its Metamodeling journey?

Take this short survey to gauge your organization’s progress toward Metamodeling leadership. Learn your strongest and weakest areas, and what you can do now to create a strategy that delivers results.

To address the criteria in this checklist for your organization, extensive selected resources are provided for sources of further research and information.

Start the Checklist

Below you will find a quick checklist designed to help you think about which Metamodeling related domains to cover and 261 essential critical questions to check off in that domain.

The following domains are covered:

Metamodeling, Software testing, Software engineering, Object model, Systems development life cycle, XML Metadata Interchange, Software design, Gradient-Enhanced Kriging, Niklaus Wirth, Poseidon for UML, Object Process Methodology, Saraju Mohanty, Extreme programming, Software configuration management, Systems modeling, Generic Eclipse Modeling System, Metadata modeling, Piecewise Polynomial, Capability Maturity Model Integration, Edsger W. Dijkstra, Domain of discourse, Waterfall model, Watts Humphrey, Agile software development, Data governance, Data model, Systems analysis, Software quality, Method engineering, Entity–relationship model, Domain-Specific Modeling, Risk management, Ivar Jacobson, Metamodeling, Business reference model, Enterprise Unified Process, Service-oriented architecture, Computer-aided software engineering, Programming paradigm, Neural network, Object-oriented programming, Software development process, International Organization for Standardization, Object Management Group, Formal methods, Model-driven engineering, Surrogate model, Structured analysis, Software deployment, Unified Process, Software quality assurance, Polynomial Metamodels, Spiral model, Project management, MODAF Meta-Model, Bertrand Meyer, Logical schema, Peri Tarr, Software architecture, View model, Software maintenance, Aspect-oriented software development, Real life, Model Driven Engineering, Space mapping, MetaCASE tool:

Metamodeling Critical Criteria:

Ventilate your thoughts about Metamodeling governance and assess and formulate effective operational and Metamodeling strategies.

– What will be the consequences to the business (financial, reputation etc) if Metamodeling does not go ahead or fails to deliver the objectives?

– Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Metamodeling delivery for example is new software needed?

Software testing Critical Criteria:

Investigate Software testing failures and achieve a single Software testing view and bringing data together.

– For your Metamodeling project, identify and describe the business environment. is there more than one layer to the business environment?

– Do you monitor the effectiveness of your Metamodeling activities?

Software engineering Critical Criteria:

Devise Software engineering planning and stake your claim.

– DevOps isnt really a product. Its not something you can buy. DevOps is fundamentally about culture and about the quality of your application. And by quality I mean the specific software engineering term of quality, of different quality attributes. What matters to you?

– How do your measurements capture actionable Metamodeling information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?

– Can we answer questions like: Was the software process followed and software engineering standards been properly applied?

– Is open source software development faster, better, and cheaper than software engineering?

– Have the types of risks that may impact Metamodeling been identified and analyzed?

– Better, and cheaper than software engineering?

– How do we Lead with Metamodeling in Mind?

Object model Critical Criteria:

Pilot Object model risks and describe which business rules are needed as Object model interface.

– What are the success criteria that will indicate that Metamodeling objectives have been met and the benefits delivered?

– Are we making progress? and are we making progress as Metamodeling leaders?

– Why should we adopt a Metamodeling framework?

Systems development life cycle Critical Criteria:

Study Systems development life cycle issues and oversee Systems development life cycle requirements.

– Why is the systems development life cycle considered an iterative process?

– What are the five steps in the systems development life cycle (sdlc)?

– What are current Metamodeling Paradigms?

– How much does Metamodeling help?

XML Metadata Interchange Critical Criteria:

Be responsible for XML Metadata Interchange leadership and ask questions.

– Why is it important to have senior management support for a Metamodeling project?

– How can you measure Metamodeling in a systematic way?

Software design Critical Criteria:

Inquire about Software design governance and report on developing an effective Software design strategy.

– Think about the people you identified for your Metamodeling project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them. what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?

– Is Metamodeling Realistic, or are you setting yourself up for failure?

– What are all of our Metamodeling domains and what do they do?

Gradient-Enhanced Kriging Critical Criteria:

Adapt Gradient-Enhanced Kriging tasks and raise human resource and employment practices for Gradient-Enhanced Kriging.

– Do we monitor the Metamodeling decisions made and fine tune them as they evolve?

– Does our organization need more Metamodeling education?

Niklaus Wirth Critical Criteria:

Substantiate Niklaus Wirth projects and catalog Niklaus Wirth activities.

– How do you incorporate cycle time, productivity, cost control, and other efficiency and effectiveness factors into these Metamodeling processes?

– What prevents me from making the changes I know will make me a more effective Metamodeling leader?

– Do we all define Metamodeling in the same way?

Poseidon for UML Critical Criteria:

Nurse Poseidon for UML visions and secure Poseidon for UML creativity.

– How do mission and objectives affect the Metamodeling processes of our organization?

– How do we know that any Metamodeling analysis is complete and comprehensive?

– Are there Metamodeling Models?

Object Process Methodology Critical Criteria:

Consider Object Process Methodology tactics and customize techniques for implementing Object Process Methodology controls.

– Consider your own Metamodeling project. what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?

– Do the Metamodeling decisions we make today help people and the planet tomorrow?

– Are we Assessing Metamodeling and Risk?

Saraju Mohanty Critical Criteria:

Review Saraju Mohanty projects and drive action.

– Is maximizing Metamodeling protection the same as minimizing Metamodeling loss?

– Have all basic functions of Metamodeling been defined?

– What are our Metamodeling Processes?

Extreme programming Critical Criteria:

Consolidate Extreme programming goals and test out new things.

– Record-keeping requirements flow from the records needed as inputs, outputs, controls and for transformation of a Metamodeling process. ask yourself: are the records needed as inputs to the Metamodeling process available?

– What is the source of the strategies for Metamodeling strengthening and reform?

– How Extreme Does Extreme Programming Have to Be?

– When using Extreme Programming?

– What Is Extreme Programming?

Software configuration management Critical Criteria:

Have a session on Software configuration management leadership and devote time assessing Software configuration management and its risk.

– What other organizational variables, such as reward systems or communication systems, affect the performance of this Metamodeling process?

– What are some of the software Configuration Management tools?

– Are accountability and ownership for Metamodeling clearly defined?

– Definition: what is software Configuration Management?

– Motivation: why software Configuration Management?

– How is the value delivered by Metamodeling being measured?

– Why software Configuration Management ?

Systems modeling Critical Criteria:

Test Systems modeling projects and get the big picture.

– Do those selected for the Metamodeling team have a good general understanding of what Metamodeling is all about?

– Does Metamodeling create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?

– What new services of functionality will be implemented next with Metamodeling ?

Generic Eclipse Modeling System Critical Criteria:

Inquire about Generic Eclipse Modeling System engagements and separate what are the business goals Generic Eclipse Modeling System is aiming to achieve.

– Why is Metamodeling important for you now?

– How do we keep improving Metamodeling?

Metadata modeling Critical Criteria:

Be responsible for Metadata modeling failures and catalog Metadata modeling activities.

– What role does communication play in the success or failure of a Metamodeling project?

– Are assumptions made in Metamodeling stated explicitly?

Piecewise Polynomial Critical Criteria:

Reconstruct Piecewise Polynomial engagements and drive action.

– How will you know that the Metamodeling project has been successful?

– What are the long-term Metamodeling goals?

Capability Maturity Model Integration Critical Criteria:

Guard Capability Maturity Model Integration management and overcome Capability Maturity Model Integration skills and management ineffectiveness.

– Is there a Metamodeling Communication plan covering who needs to get what information when?

– How do we Identify specific Metamodeling investment and emerging trends?

– What are the usability implications of Metamodeling actions?

Edsger W. Dijkstra Critical Criteria:

Disseminate Edsger W. Dijkstra planning and oversee implementation of Edsger W. Dijkstra.

– Think about the kind of project structure that would be appropriate for your Metamodeling project. should it be formal and complex, or can it be less formal and relatively simple?

– Have you identified your Metamodeling key performance indicators?

– Is a Metamodeling Team Work effort in place?

Domain of discourse Critical Criteria:

Deliberate over Domain of discourse management and integrate design thinking in Domain of discourse innovation.

– In a project to restructure Metamodeling outcomes, which stakeholders would you involve?

– Can Management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Metamodeling?

Waterfall model Critical Criteria:

Contribute to Waterfall model visions and frame using storytelling to create more compelling Waterfall model projects.

– Do we aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Metamodeling services/products?

– What is our formula for success in Metamodeling ?

Watts Humphrey Critical Criteria:

Boost Watts Humphrey governance and ask questions.

– What are your current levels and trends in key measures or indicators of Metamodeling product and process performance that are important to and directly serve your customers? how do these results compare with the performance of your competitors and other organizations with similar offerings?

– A compounding model resolution with available relevant data can often provide insight towards a solution methodology; which Metamodeling models, tools and techniques are necessary?

Agile software development Critical Criteria:

Value Agile software development decisions and overcome Agile software development skills and management ineffectiveness.

– When you are identifying the potential technical strategy(s) you have several process factors that you should address. As with initial scoping how much detail you go into when documenting the architecture, the views that you create, and your approach to modeling are important considerations. Furthermore, will you be considering one or more candidate architectures and what is your overall delivery strategy?

– Management buy-in is a concern. Many program managers are worried that upper-level management would ask for progress reports and productivity metrics that would be hard to gather in an Agile work environment. Management ignorance of Agile methodologies is also a worry. Will Agile advantages be able to overcome the well-known existing problems in software development?

– Could Agile Manifesto and agile methods be a good starting point for the corporate venture to start their development effort towards their own, efficient agile in-house software development method?

– When youre thinking about all the different ways a product may be used in the future, do you stop at three, five, or 10 years in the future?

– How could agile approach be utilized in other parts and functions of an organization, for instance in marketing?

– Does the organization have a distinct quality program that support continuous process improvement?

– Why should a client choose a project team which offers agile software development?

– Do we ask in the sprint retrospective: What went well during the sprint?

– What are the a best practices for Agile SCRUM Product Management?

– How could principles be more precisely measured or valued?

– How do you best coordinate Agile and non-Agile teams?

– So what do your developers do differently in agile?

– How could a more enhanced framework be developed?

– How do Web Operators communicate with Developers?

– What challenges do teams face when scaling agile?

– What is the expected system lifetime?

– Does your team use Agile Methodology?

– Any impediments/stumbling blocks?

– When should we not use it?

– A separate test team?

Data governance Critical Criteria:

Administer Data governance planning and visualize why should people listen to you regarding Data governance.

– Are stakeholders, including eligible students or students parents, regularly notified about their rights under applicable federal and state laws governing data privacy?

– Data Considerations. Data governance, confidentiality, integrity and quality need to be preserved by the migration. Is the data bound by statutory compliance?

– Have mechanisms been put in place to de-identify data whenever possible(e.g.,by removing all direct and indirect identifiers)?

– What if youre still trying to create collections of policies, rules, and data definitions?

– What could your organization look like with a mature data governance program?

– What was the most important criteria/item in the personnel system project?

– How do you know if decisions have reached the necessary people?

– What is the utility of having and using a communications plan?

– Is data subject to legislative oversight or mandates?

– How does it align with to the to be architecture?

– Who are the users & what are they looking for?

– What factors make data governance successful?

– Are there too many documents in a category?

– Do you use the best tools money can buy?

– How to govern its use and maintenance?

– What level of data will users get?

– Is there a Change navigation list?

– Is the information identifiable?

– Who determines access controls?

– Is there a data dictionary?

Data model Critical Criteria:

Rank Data model decisions and find the ideas you already have.

– What are our best practices for minimizing Metamodeling project risk, while demonstrating incremental value and quick wins throughout the Metamodeling project lifecycle?

– What are the data model, data definitions, structure, and hosting options of purchased applications (COTS)?

– What is the physical data model definition (derived from logical data models) used to design the database?

– How likely is the current Metamodeling plan to come in on schedule or on budget?

– What are the Key enablers to make this Metamodeling move?

– Physical data model available?

– Logical data model available?

Systems analysis Critical Criteria:

Have a session on Systems analysis risks and drive action.

– How can expected costs and benefits be quantified to determine whether the new system will indeed be cost-effective?

– Schedule feasibility. can the solution be designed and implemented within an acceptable time period?

– What criteria are most appropriate for assessing whether the systems attainments are adequate?

– How can probability estimates be obtained when the information available is severely limited?

–  What is the purpose of the Systems Analysis report during the Systems Analysis phase?

– What process must the company go through to obtain and implement a new system?

– What are the different roles that are played on our systems development team?

– What records are kept and how do they fit in with the functions?

– How do we practically monitor or measure margin to criticality?

– Is this an acceptable application of a disruptive technology?

– What are examples of nonmeasurable benefits of new systems?

– What means can a project sponsor use to communicate?

– When are users trained to use the new system?

– What other people take part in this system?

– How are our information systems developed ?

– What part of the system is working well?

– Systems Analysis and design: why is it?

– Why have Systems Analysis at all?

– Can something be combined?

– Can something be changed?

Software quality Critical Criteria:

Think about Software quality adoptions and mentor Software quality customer orientation.

– Does the software Quality Assurance function have a management reporting channel separate from the software development project management?

– Are software Quality Assurance tests a part of the general hardware acceptance test on the customers machine before it leaves the factory?

– Do software Quality Assurance test programs undergo the same production cycle and method (except q/a) as the software they test?

– Is software Quality Assurance done by an independently reporting agency representing the interests of the eventual user?

– Is at least one person engaged in software Quality Assurance for every ten engaged in its fabrication?

– What are the best practices for software quality assurance when using agile development methodologies?

– Does Metamodeling analysis show the relationships among important Metamodeling factors?

– The need for high-quality software is glaring. But what constitutes software quality?

– Does Metamodeling analysis isolate the fundamental causes of problems?

– What is our Metamodeling Strategy?

Method engineering Critical Criteria:

X-ray Method engineering adoptions and correct Method engineering management by competencies.

– Do several people in different organizational units assist with the Metamodeling process?

Entity–relationship model Critical Criteria:

Refer to Entity–relationship model tasks and remodel and develop an effective Entity–relationship model strategy.

– What are the top 3 things at the forefront of our Metamodeling agendas for the next 3 years?

Domain-Specific Modeling Critical Criteria:

Align Domain-Specific Modeling projects and suggest using storytelling to create more compelling Domain-Specific Modeling projects.

– Who will be responsible for making the decisions to include or exclude requested changes once Metamodeling is underway?

– Is Metamodeling dependent on the successful delivery of a current project?

– What are the short and long-term Metamodeling goals?

Risk management Critical Criteria:

Debate over Risk management governance and handle a jump-start course to Risk management.

– When a risk is retired, do we review the history of the risk to record any lessons learned regarding the Risk Management processes used. is the team essentially asking itself: what, if anything, would we have done differently and why?

– Describe your organizations policies and procedures governing risk generally and Cybersecurity risk specifically. How does senior management communicate and oversee these policies and procedures?

– What are the responsibilities of the erm. Does the function serve as a coordinating body for the individual Risk Management activities or as an advisory body?

– Do we provide the right level of specificity and guidance for mitigating the impact of Cybersecurity measures on privacy and civil liberties?

– Has Cybersecurity been identified in the physical security plans for the assets, reflecting planning for a blended cyber/physical attack?

– What performance goals do we adopt to ensure our ability to provide essential services while managing Cybersecurity risk?

– Have you broken down your risks into the COSO ERM categories: Strategic, Financial Reporting, Operating and Regulatory?

– Are recovery activities communicated to internal stakeholders and executive and management teams?

– Estimate the change in financial investment for ITRM activities in the next 12 months?

– Do you have an enterprise-wide risk management program that includes Cybersecurity?

– What are the best practices for Risk Management in Social Media?

– Which of our information is connected to the internet?

– How do you assess threats to your system and assets?

– If we cant fix it, how do we do it differently?

– Does the risk only impact life-cycle cost?

– Is the risk above an acceptable level?

– Are we working on the right risks?

– Which systems are most vulnerable?

Ivar Jacobson Critical Criteria:

Experiment with Ivar Jacobson results and work towards be a leading Ivar Jacobson expert.

– What vendors make products that address the Metamodeling needs?

Metamodeling Critical Criteria:

Bootstrap Metamodeling results and acquire concise Metamodeling education.

– What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Metamodeling project?

– What are specific Metamodeling Rules to follow?

Business reference model Critical Criteria:

Debate over Business reference model strategies and do something to it.

– How do we measure improved Metamodeling service perception, and satisfaction?

– Will Metamodeling deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?

Enterprise Unified Process Critical Criteria:

Gauge Enterprise Unified Process projects and test out new things.

– When a Metamodeling manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?

– Is Supporting Metamodeling documentation required?

– What are internal and external Metamodeling relations?

Service-oriented architecture Critical Criteria:

Sort Service-oriented architecture visions and oversee implementation of Service-oriented architecture.

Computer-aided software engineering Critical Criteria:

Study Computer-aided software engineering strategies and arbitrate Computer-aided software engineering techniques that enhance teamwork and productivity.

Programming paradigm Critical Criteria:

Confer re Programming paradigm management and track iterative Programming paradigm results.

– What is the purpose of Metamodeling in relation to the mission?

Neural network Critical Criteria:

Categorize Neural network visions and correct Neural network management by competencies.

Object-oriented programming Critical Criteria:

Confer over Object-oriented programming failures and report on the economics of relationships managing Object-oriented programming and constraints.

Software development process Critical Criteria:

Have a round table over Software development process failures and oversee Software development process requirements.

– Where does User Experience come from, what does it add to the software development process and what methods are available?

– To what extent does management recognize Metamodeling as a tool to increase the results?

– How do we go about Securing Metamodeling?

International Organization for Standardization Critical Criteria:

Revitalize International Organization for Standardization issues and find the essential reading for International Organization for Standardization researchers.

– How would one define Metamodeling leadership?

Object Management Group Critical Criteria:

Generalize Object Management Group tasks and maintain Object Management Group for success.

– At what point will vulnerability assessments be performed once Metamodeling is put into production (e.g., ongoing Risk Management after implementation)?

– How do we go about Comparing Metamodeling approaches/solutions?

Formal methods Critical Criteria:

Extrapolate Formal methods adoptions and acquire concise Formal methods education.

– In the case of a Metamodeling project, the criteria for the audit derive from implementation objectives. an audit of a Metamodeling project involves assessing whether the recommendations outlined for implementation have been met. in other words, can we track that any Metamodeling project is implemented as planned, and is it working?

– Who will be responsible for deciding whether Metamodeling goes ahead or not after the initial investigations?

Model-driven engineering Critical Criteria:

Canvass Model-driven engineering tactics and get going.

– Who sets the Metamodeling standards?

Surrogate model Critical Criteria:

Pilot Surrogate model results and research ways can we become the Surrogate model company that would put us out of business.

– Do Metamodeling rules make a reasonable demand on a users capabilities?

– Do we have past Metamodeling Successes?

Structured analysis Critical Criteria:

Think carefully about Structured analysis issues and adopt an insight outlook.

– How do you determine the key elements that affect Metamodeling workforce satisfaction? how are these elements determined for different workforce groups and segments?

– Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Metamodeling? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?

Software deployment Critical Criteria:

Guard Software deployment governance and shift your focus.

– What are your results for key measures or indicators of the accomplishment of your Metamodeling strategy and action plans, including building and strengthening core competencies?

Unified Process Critical Criteria:

Steer Unified Process strategies and test out new things.

– Think about the functions involved in your Metamodeling project. what processes flow from these functions?

– What are the record-keeping requirements of Metamodeling activities?

Software quality assurance Critical Criteria:

Value Software quality assurance tactics and report on setting up Software quality assurance without losing ground.

– What are the business goals Metamodeling is aiming to achieve?

– How will you measure your Metamodeling effectiveness?

Polynomial Metamodels Critical Criteria:

X-ray Polynomial Metamodels strategies and create Polynomial Metamodels explanations for all managers.

– Is the scope of Metamodeling defined?

Spiral model Critical Criteria:

Accommodate Spiral model goals and do something to it.

– What potential environmental factors impact the Metamodeling effort?

Project management Critical Criteria:

Administer Project management decisions and customize techniques for implementing Project management controls.

– There is lots of discussion about the role of a project manager; whether a project manager is needed in the agile world or not. How much and which way a traditional project manager has to change his/her management style or way of working in order to be an agile project manager?

– From an organizational perspective, what are the trade-offs involved in shifting all project management to an agile approach, versus maintaining a mixed portfolio of agile and traditional development?

– When we say that the traditional project team is not self-organized, no matter how complex the project is, and what level of team we are discussing?

– Originally, agile project management required collocated teams. How could a new product or service be developed in the 21st century without them?

– Are your current project management and time and expense capture applications outdated and expensive to update and maintain?

– How much effort and investment in time and resources will be required to develop new tools, templates and processes?

– What about when our product is an integration of several different products, each with their own product owner?

– So, how do we adapt project management techniques to deal with this key reality?

– Do project management and Change Management look the same for every initiative?

– Are the project teams ready to function within agile project management?

– Does implementation of project management require a culture change?

– Can Agility Work With a Waterfall Project Management Process in our Setting?

– How will stakeholders and customers react to the change?

– What is an economic aspect of Project Management?

– How do we deal with change when it happens?

– How much project management is needed?

– So then, what is a virtual team?

– When is done done?

MODAF Meta-Model Critical Criteria:

Dissect MODAF Meta-Model planning and look for lots of ideas.

Bertrand Meyer Critical Criteria:

Co-operate on Bertrand Meyer leadership and integrate design thinking in Bertrand Meyer innovation.

– What are your key performance measures or indicators and in-process measures for the control and improvement of your Metamodeling processes?

– What other jobs or tasks affect the performance of the steps in the Metamodeling process?

– Which Metamodeling goals are the most important?

Logical schema Critical Criteria:

Prioritize Logical schema issues and stake your claim.

– How do we manage Metamodeling Knowledge Management (KM)?

Peri Tarr Critical Criteria:

Categorize Peri Tarr leadership and separate what are the business goals Peri Tarr is aiming to achieve.

Software architecture Critical Criteria:

Canvass Software architecture governance and adjust implementation of Software architecture.

View model Critical Criteria:

Set goals for View model risks and reduce View model costs.

– What is the total cost related to deploying Metamodeling, including any consulting or professional services?

– Who will provide the final approval of Metamodeling deliverables?

Software maintenance Critical Criteria:

Closely inspect Software maintenance failures and budget for Software maintenance challenges.

– If the path forward waits until a new generation of devices essentially replaces an old generation of devices which could be somewhere between 5 and 15 years, what does the path forward look like for the legacy devices and their software maintenance?

– Among the Metamodeling product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?

Aspect-oriented software development Critical Criteria:

Think carefully about Aspect-oriented software development failures and maintain Aspect-oriented software development for success.

– How will we insure seamless interoperability of Metamodeling moving forward?

Real life Critical Criteria:

Have a round table over Real life issues and catalog Real life activities.

– How has data governance worked in real life?

– Does Agile Release Management Work in Real Life?

Model Driven Engineering Critical Criteria:

Audit Model Driven Engineering planning and gather Model Driven Engineering models .

– Does Metamodeling include applications and information with regulatory compliance significance (or other contractual conditions that must be formally complied with) in a new or unique manner for which no approved security requirements, templates or design models exist?

– What are the key elements of your Metamodeling performance improvement system, including your evaluation, organizational learning, and innovation processes?

Space mapping Critical Criteria:

Deliberate over Space mapping issues and improve Space mapping service perception.

– Who is responsible for ensuring appropriate resources (time, people and money) are allocated to Metamodeling?

– Are there any disadvantages to implementing Metamodeling? There might be some that are less obvious?

MetaCASE tool Critical Criteria:

Generalize MetaCASE tool strategies and balance specific methods for improving MetaCASE tool results.


This quick readiness checklist is a selected resource to help you move forward. Learn more about how to achieve comprehensive insights with the Metamodeling Self Assessment:


Author: Gerard Blokdijk

CEO at The Art of Service | theartofservice.com



Gerard is the CEO at The Art of Service. He has been providing information technology insights, talks, tools and products to organizations in a wide range of industries for over 25 years. Gerard is a widely recognized and respected information expert. Gerard founded The Art of Service consulting business in 2000. Gerard has authored numerous published books to date.

External links:

To address the criteria in this checklist, these selected resources are provided for sources of further research and information:

Metamodeling External links:

[PDF]Metamodeling – University of Toronto

Software testing External links:

Scriptless Test Automation Platform | Software Testing Tool

Software Testing Certification Information – ASTQB …

Quality Assurance & Software Testing- Reston VA

Software engineering External links:

Academy for Software Engineering / Homepage

Software Engineering Services

Omnitech-Inc. – Data & Software Engineering Solutions

Object model External links:

Component Object Model (COM)

Known issues in Outlook 2010 when you use the object model

Systems development life cycle External links:

Systems Development Life Cycle – SSB


The Systems Development Life Cycle, assignment help

XML Metadata Interchange External links:

XML Metadata Interchange – Revolvy
update.revolvy.com/topic/XML Metadata Interchange

XML Metadata Interchange (XMI)

About the XML Metadata Interchange Specification …

Software design External links:

Web and Mobile Software Design, Development, and Support

Software Design and Development | Green River

Custom Software Design & Development | FrogSlayer

Gradient-Enhanced Kriging External links:

Performance study of gradient-enhanced Kriging | …

Development of Gradient-Enhanced Kriging …

Poseidon for UML External links:

CiteSeerX — Poseidon for UML

Object Process Methodology External links:

Object process methodology – PlanOpedia

Extreme programming External links:

AgileFAQs – Expert Agile, Scrum, eXtreme Programming …

Software configuration management External links:

Set up the software configuration management …

Software configuration management
In software engineering, software configuration management (SCM or S/W CM) is the task of tracking and controlling changes in the software, part of the larger cross-disciplinary field of configuration management. SCM practices include revision control and the establishment of baselines. If something goes wrong, SCM can determine what was changed and who changed it.

Systems modeling External links:

Center for Dynamic Systems Modeling and Control | …

ERIC – Decisive Factors in Systems Modeling and …

Water Distribution Systems Modeling using EPANET | …

Generic Eclipse Modeling System External links:

GEMS abbreviation stands for Generic Eclipse Modeling System

[PDF]The Generic Eclipse Modeling System – Vanderbilt …

Metadata modeling External links:

“A metadata modeling approach to database …

Piecewise Polynomial External links:

[PDF]Piecewise Polynomial Interpolation

Capability Maturity Model Integration External links:

[PDF]Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Overview

Edsger W. Dijkstra External links:

Edsger W. Dijkstra • IEEE Computer Society

What is Edsger W. Dijkstra famous for? – Quora

Waterfall model External links:

Waterfall Model Flashcards | Quizlet

Waterfall model
The waterfall model is a sequential design process, used in software development processes, in which progress is seen as flowing steadily downwards (like a waterfall) through the phases of conception, initiation, analysis, design, construction, testing, production/implementation and maintenance.

SDLC – Waterfall Model – tutorialspoint.com

Watts Humphrey External links:

G. Watts Humphrey, Jr. | America’s Best Racing

Agile software development External links:

Big Room Studios | Agile Software Development Company

Mobile Apps, Digital Products, Agile Software Development

Data governance External links:

Data Governance – Do Job Titles Matter? – DATAVERSITY

What is data governance (DG)? – Definition from WhatIs.com

Dataguise | Sensitive Data Governance

Data model External links:

IPLD – The data model of the content-addressable web

What is data modeling? Webopedia Definition

Data Warehouse data model | Microsoft Docs

Systems analysis External links:

P E Systems | Systems Analysis | Technology Services

My Systems Analysis Ch. 2 Flashcards | Quizlet

Systems Analysis and Integration | Transportation …

Software quality External links:

[PDF]Title: Software Quality Assurance Engineer Reports …

[PPT]Software Quality Assurance (SQA)

Domain-Specific Modeling External links:

Domain-Specific Modeling Theory and Practice …

MetaCase – Domain-Specific Modeling with MetaEdit+

Risk management External links:

Risk Management Job Titles | Enlighten Jobs

20 Best Title:(risk Management Manager) jobs (Hiring …

irmi.com – Risk Management | Insurance Education

Ivar Jacobson External links:

Ivar Jacobson International

Metamodeling External links:

[PDF]Metamodeling – University of Toronto

Business reference model External links:

Business Reference Model Version 2.0 – HSDL

Computer-aided software engineering External links:

[PDF]Computer-Aided Software Engineering

Programming paradigm External links:

JavaScript follows which Programming Paradigm? – …

Neural network External links:

SUPPORT – Neural Network Console

Neural Network Console

Neural Network Libraries

Object-oriented programming External links:

What is object-oriented programming? – Updated 2017

Software development process External links:

Software Development Process Flashcards | Quizlet

International Organization for Standardization External links:

ISO – International Organization for Standardization

ISO – International Organization for Standardization

MDMC – International Organization for Standardization …

Object Management Group External links:

Object Management Group – Home | Facebook

Formal methods External links:

Benchmarks on Formal Methods for Robotics

Formal Methods – Carnegie Mellon University

Model-driven engineering External links:

Marco Brambilla – Data Science and Model-Driven Engineering.

Surrogate model External links:

[PDF]Validation of Surrogate Model-Based Life Prediction for …

Surrogate model
A surrogate model is an engineering method used when an outcome of interest cannot be easily directly measured, so a model of the outcome is used instead. Most engineering design problems require experiments and/or simulations to evaluate design objective and constraint functions as function of design variables.

Surrogate model
A surrogate model is an engineering method used when an outcome of interest cannot be easily directly measured, so a model of the outcome is used instead. Most engineering design problems require experiments and/or simulations to evaluate design objective and constraint functions as function of design variables.

Structured analysis External links:

What is Structured Analysis? – Definition from Techopedia

Software deployment External links:

WPKG | Open Source Software Deployment and Distribution

AprelTech – Software Deployment

[PDF]Automating Software Deployment – New York University

Unified Process External links:

CDC UP | Home Page of the CDC Unified Process

Software quality assurance External links:

Software Quality Assurance Engineers & Testers at My Next Move

Spiral model External links:

Create Spiral Model in PowerPoint Easily

SDLC – Spiral Model – tutorialspoint.com

Boehm’s Spiral Model Flashcards | Quizlet

Project management External links:

LearnSmart IT & Project Management Online Training …

Pepper Construction Project Management Solution

Career Academy – Project Management, Business Skills, …

MODAF Meta-Model External links:

[PDF]MOD Architectural Framework The MODAF Meta-Model

Bertrand Meyer External links:

Bertrand Meyer – The Mathematics Genealogy Project

Bertrand Meyer Profiles | Facebook

Logical schema External links:

What is the difference between logical schema and …

Software architecture External links:

Chapter 1: What is Software Architecture?

.NET Software Architecture Workshops – Stack Mechanics

Rofoz B.V. | Software Architecture Consultancy & …

View model External links:

View / View Model Naming Conventions · Caliburn.Micro

Clayton Homes: The Grand View Model Home …


Real life External links:

Real Life Church

Glossier | Skincare & Beauty Products Inspired by Real Life

VisitBratislava – The City where you find real life

Model Driven Engineering External links:

Model Driven Engineering | Department of Computer …

Space mapping External links:

Reciprocal Space Mapping – TheFreeDictionary

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *